Skip to main content
Crest Competition Appeal Tribunal

Secondary Header Navigation

  • Contact us
  • Register for updates

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Cases
  • Judgments
  • Diary
  • Rules and Guidance
  • Frequently asked questions
  • About the Tribunal
  • Document Archive

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Judgments

Judgment (Costs)

Related Cases

  • 1114/1/1/09 (1) Kier Group plc (2) Kier Regional Limited v Office of Fair Trading
  • 1119/1/1/09 Ballast Nedam N.V. v Office of Fair Trading
  • 1127/1/1/09 (1) Bowmer and Kirkland Limited (2) B&K Property Services Limited v Office of Fair Trading
  • 1129/1/1/09 Corringway Conclusions PLC (in liquidation) v Office of Fair Trading
  • 1132/1/1/09 (1) Thomas Vale Holdings Limited (2) Thomas Vale Construction PLC v Office of Fair Trading
  • 1133/1/1/09 (1) John Sisk & Son Limited (2) Sicon Limited v Office of Fair Trading

Neutral Citation Number

[2011] CAT 33

Published

21/10/2011
Download Full Judgment

Summary

Judgment of the Tribunal on applications for costs made by Kier, Ballast, Bowmer, Corringway, Thomas Vale and Sisk.

This is an unofficial summary prepared by the Registry of the Competition Appeal Tribunal.

Footer menu

  • Contact us
  • FOI
  • Other useful websites
  • Accessibility
  • Copyright notice
  • Disclaimer
  • Cookies
  • Register for updates

© 2025 Competition Appeal Tribunal

Salisbury Square House, 8 Salisbury Square, London, EC4Y 8AP